Fee Controversy at Aréna Cité-des-Jeunes: Île Perrot Residents Left Out in the Cold

Recent changes to the access policy for the Aréna Cité-des-Jeunes have sparked frustration and disappointment among residents of Île Perrot. While the arena remains a hub for winter recreation in the region, a newly imposed $10 fee for non-residents of Notre-Dame-de-l’Île-Perrot (NDIP) and its partner cities—Pincourt, Terrasse-Vaudreuil, and Vaudreuil-Dorion—has led to calls for greater inclusivity.

### **The Policy Change**

Karen McLaren, representing the NDIP assembly, announced the changes, citing the need to prioritize local residents and those from cities contributing to the management of the arena. While NDIP and its partners maintain free access to the rink, Île Perrot residents and others outside the partnership are now required to pay the fee during peak periods and provide proof of residency.

According to NDIP, this fee is intended to ensure "harmonious cohabitation of all rink users" and preserve the rink's primary purpose as a municipal facility. However, many argue the policy disproportionately affects communities like Île Perrot, which were not part of the arena management project.

### **Resident Reactions**

Île Perrot residents have expressed frustration, feeling excluded from a regional amenity that they have historically enjoyed. One resident asked, “Is there any recourse for our community to advocate for inclusion, or does this decision permanently exclude us for years to come?”

The sentiment is echoed by families and ice rink enthusiasts who see the fee as a barrier to access. Many argue that as neighbors, Île Perrot should be given the opportunity to revisit its exclusion from the partnership agreement or negotiate fairer terms for rink access.

### **Community Concerns**

Critics of the policy point to several potential issues:

- **Equity**: The rink attracts users from across the region, yet the fee applies unequally to neighboring communities.

- **Missed Opportunities**: Collaborative partnerships with Île Perrot could strengthen the region and support the arena’s financial sustainability.

- **Long-Term Exclusion**: Residents worry that the decision may set a precedent, permanently barring them from full access to a valuable community resource.

### **What’s Next?**

The debate raises broader questions about regional cooperation and shared access to public facilities. While NDIP has defended the policy as a fair allocation of resources, Île Perrot residents are considering advocacy efforts to push for change.

### **A Call for Inclusion**

Many are calling on municipal leaders to revisit the terms of the arena’s management and explore potential collaboration with Île Perrot. Increased dialogue and transparency could foster a sense of shared ownership and benefit all residents.

As the winter season begins, the controversy underscores the importance of balancing local priorities with regional inclusivity. For now, Île Perrot residents are left wondering if their voices will be heard—or if they’ll remain on the sidelines.